Disturbing Disney Maleficent Advertisement

Recently Disney released an advertisement for "Maleficent" entitled "Party Crasher".





I am working on writing an article about Maleficent, however, have decided to wait until after I watch the movie.
Read more...

Joe Ureneck for MA District 4 Governors Council

The court system in Massachusetts has had a series of cancers growing in, and around it, which have compromised the courts ability to rule effectively, and do what's truly best for the individuals it issues judgement to/for and instead it appears to be a tool to serve self interests. Because of those interests either political of financial, or if certain individuals want to gain power, and prestige, the court cannot be considered as impartial.

There is a growing number of people, organizations, and groups who understand that there is a problem with the family court system. Fathers frequently get put through the ringer, financially drained, emotionally drained, and to say that they get the short end of the stick when it comes to parental rights would be an understatement.

One of the groups that has emerged in Massachusetts is "The Fatherhood Coalition". The chairman of said group is taking a step beyond

Why I am a candidate
As chairman of The Fatherhood Coalition I monitored nearly every public judicial nomination hearing before the Governor's Council and attended more hearings than many councilors. Nominees routinely are not asked the most important questions - such as how they would handle important issues of law that conflict with the constitutional rights of those who appear before them in court. Nonetheless all are usually approved for life as judges by the council. The disregard of constitutional safeguards must change.
Our courts today do not consider providing 'Justice' their priority but instead consider keeping the court system functioning like a factory conveyor their main purpose. Governor Councilors at judicial nomination hearings often discuss the 'temperament 'of a nominee and the 'quality of justice' in Massachusetts courts. This is not 'justice' but a euphemisms for court management - not whether justice is delivered.

As Governor Councilor I will insist that all judicial nominees place 'Justice' first and foremost as their goal and will vote against those who do not.
Comments

As the chair of the Fatherhood Coalition Joe Ureneck has a great understanding of what parents go through in Massachusetts. He has seen families ripped apart by the courts, and the Department of Children and Families (DCF). Knowing the specific areas of government that are causing the pain, and hardship to children and families allows Joe to specifically target those areas in an effort to remove their power.

Hopefully Joe is part of the beginning of those who have become aware of the massive problems in Massachusetts in regards to children and families. We need more people who are not afraid to step up and push for things such as fathers rights, and shared parenting. A person who isn't controlled by the "feminist" propaganda or by groups/individuals that don't care about the children, but rather lining their own pockets, or worse.

November 4th, 2014 A lot of people don't vote because they don't believe it matters and both parties are essentially the same. In this case, however, the candidate will have the ability to start to dismantle, change, or slow down the corrupt system attacking families.

If you live in Massachusetts District 4, and believe in things such as shared parenting, and removing the courts and administrative  panels from interfering with parenting when they shouldn't be involved then please vote for Joe Ureneck, and help start to fix the Commonwealth and turn it into a beacon of light for other jurisdictions, as well as  hopefully motivate others to look into the details


Read more...

How Much Blood Did Jeff Bauman Lose at Boston Bombing?

For those unfamiliar with the Boston Bombing one of the victims was a man by the name Jeff Bauman, who lost both legs below the knee, and is seen in several iconic images of the events. Bauman made an amazing recovery, and was involved in photo shoots giving gifts to other victims, as well as being a special flag waver at the Boston Bruins hockey game. Bauman was rescued by a cowboy hat wearing Carlos Arrendondo.

This article, using some rough estimates, will attempt to show how much blood Jeff Bauman lost at the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing.

Read more...

The Truth Behind Angelina Jolie and her Double Masectomy

While speaking with friends today I realized that I have never published my article on Angelina Jolie, and no longer have the draft which is unfortunate because I lost a lot of connected dots.


Most are aware that Angelina Jolie underwent a double voluntary mastectomy. That is likely the extent people heard of this. However, there is a machine working behind Angelina Jolie in a scientifically cold fashion that puts Angelina to shame for everything she alleges to be.

Angelina claims to be a "feminst" and promoting womans issues. Her double mastectomy was hearled as a great feminist move, by giving woman the chance to determine if they have a gene that could lead to breast cancer, and remove the threat before it becomes malignant and spreads. If she was really a feminist she would be embracing the female figure, the shape of the goddess, the clearly female image full with breasts. Instead of focusing on how thousands of women are being maimed, and disfigured by having breast cancer, and how a large part of their external feminism is taken from them, she instead engages on a fear propaganda parade scaring woman into think that they need to get this new test. They too may be able to prevent getting breast cancer later on in life if they catch the gene, and remove the breasts early. A true feminist should be outraged that the female figure of beauty is being destroyed, and Angelina claims to be a feminist saying that the removal of breasts that is horrible when done due to cancer, should be voluntary.

The break down of society, the blurring of gender lines, the destruction of what is typically masculine, and feminine is one aspect of Angelina Jolies stunt, which exactly what is what.

Another aspect of her stunt was the timing. Angelina was featured on the May, 2013 cover of Time Magazine, which had the effect of spreading her story far, and gaining a massive amount of publicity. There were scores of young woman who saw Angelina as being "brave" for what she did, and they they too should take the test to possibly save themselves from the future.

The reason this timing is so important is because the company that offered the testing, which Angelina used to determine she had the gene, is known as Myriad Genetics. This company is in the buisness of isolating human genes, and then patenting them meaning anyone who wants to use their test, has to pay their price, and if another Dr does the test for a lower income patient for less they will get sued by Myriad's massive legal department. The test would cost as little as $100 if it was unregulated, on average it's $4000 while Myriad held the patent. Myriad Genetics was involved in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case in which the Supreme Court would determine if a company could patent genes, and in effect basically decide who lives, and dies on who can afford their treatment.

The Supreme Court issued their decision on June 13th, 2013 in an unanimous decision rejected Myriads position of patenting genes, and thus barring Myriad of any companies in the future from doing the same thing. It shouldn't take a great deal of critical thinking to understand why patenting parts of the human body is at the best unethical, and at worst strictly evil. It's no conincidence that a month before the decision Angelina had a huge publicity stunt, featured on numerous news shows, articles, across the internet, and on the cover of time. This was to turn public opinion in favor of companies such as Myriad, potentially swaying the courts decision.

The third aspect of Angelina's stunt is it's using misinformation, complicated scientific jargon many don't understand, and in some cases just lying to push an agenda to make money. First the BRCA1 gene which is tested for - is present in every living mammal. If you inherent a single copy from your parent that has the mutation that causes cancer then the test would be understandable, however, science shows that the majority of cases are caused by external variables, and that a person with a healthy BRCA1 gene can over time undergo the mutation. One of the reasons breast cancer is on such a massive rise is because of all the cancer causing chemicals in the environment mimic estrogen, and the breasts of a female experience several stages of new cell growth, birth, puberty, pregnancy, meta-pose.

Here is an excellent medical journal study exposing the problem, that was just published this year. There are several statistic that stand out, and it's hard to pick just one to illustrate the magnitude of this scientific hoax.

Of the 251 women who strongly considered CPM, we found that those who ultimately received CPM (n = 81) were significantly different from those who ultimately received UM or BCS (n = 170). The former group was significantly more often white (71.6% vs 22.9%) (P < .001), highly educated (88.9% vs 44.9%) (P < .001)

Interesting that of the study group the women who underwent having both their breast removed were highly educated white women. Would it be a stretch to assume they probably could afford the $4000 tests of which the poorer minorities could no way afford. I encourage readers to read my article "Abortion, Murder, and Run Down Conditions - A look at Planned Parenthood"  which gives much more abortions to those below the poverty line, than even those hovering around it, most are minorities, and they somehow save millions on operating costs, plus PP was originally a eugenics organization. This is similar, drive up fear of a deadly disease, and the need for a test to detect it. Those who can pay, will pay. Those who can't, won't. Either way people will still develop cancer, and pay at that stage, but this allows the medical industry to suck out extra money from the wealthy who get their medical advice from Angelina Jolie.

Read more...

Analysis of My UFO Picture from April 14th, 2014 Lunar Eclipse

On the night of April 14th, 2014 there was a Lunar Eclipse that many called a "blood moon".

I had been photographing the Moon with only the camera on my cell phone. I was viewing the Moon with my naked eye, and taking pictures after briefly looking at the screen to see if I was in focus, as opposed to strictly looking at the screen to capture images. I did not see this phenomenon with my eyes, rather was looking at the moon, shifted my view to the screen of my phone, seeing the image was in focus I pressed the capture button.

After reviewing the pictures after being shot I noticed that in one of the pictures there is a light visible above the Moon. This light cannot be a plane. There are two street lights at the edges of the frame, and a bright light in the center of the frame, all of which are causing lens flare however the flares do not reach the object, and there is a significant gap between the ends of the flares, and the object.

I found this interesting, and mentioned it to several people the next day, however my attention was peaked after seeing this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rB7_Wl248sw&feature=share&list=UUW4k9vXjgOSDcYq6Ge9hWWg which the author, and others, have seemed to capture a massive number of objects on the night of the eclipse, and since. The image taken on April 14th, were obviously independent of this video published May 24th,

For the sake of full disclosure I have uploaded the raw image, as well as the raw image of a shot taken seconds before. Additionally I have posted a picture of the image with a negative filter applied which clearly shows that the light is a UFO and not a photo effect.

Image of UFO captured.

Image captured seconds before, showing no anomaly.

Image with negative filter applied shows clearly object is not an artifact 

Fotoforensics analysis link: 

Additionally here is a zoomed in version of the object, zoomed in to 1074%

 

Another note is that the full lunar eclipse was supposed to occur at 12:07 AM PST on April 15th, 2014, or 3:07 AM EST on April 15th, 2014. The image of the UFO was taken at 8:56:39 PM EST on April 14th, 2013.

Here is an image from steallarium at 8:56:39 PM EST that shows the locations of the Moon, and Mars as seen from the same location (Massachusetts) with the aid of a protractor. There are several problems if this light was to be Mars.
 1) It is not visible in the shot from seconds earlier, that had no additional zoom, however a slight different angle, and tilt in respect to the building.

 2) Mars is almost perfectly above the Moon in a direct line, if anything a fraction of a degree to the left.. The UFO is above the Moon, however it's several degrees to the right. Due to the relative size, and distance of the objects there is no possible way I could have taken this image which changed the angle of the Moon, and Mars. If I was standing on my head, or tilted backwards, or forwards it is impossible to achieve this effect.

3) The UFO is captured using an expose of 1/5th of a second. The Moon appears as a perfect sphere, the words on the building are perfect. The lens on the camera was in focus, and the camera was not being shaken during the 1/5th of a second that light was allowed to enter. The UFO is streaking. If it were Mars due to the distance, and short exposure it should appear as a point of light. There is a way to figure out how fast an object would have to be moving to cause it to blur with a 1/5th of a second shutter speed, but that is far too complicated. The fact remains due to the fast shutter speed the object must have been moving at a high rate of speed, and have been a source of it's own light. 

Read more...

Is the Power of the Internet Being Purposely Withheld? Part 2

In the first part of this 2 part article I discussed several science fiction style conspiracy theories surrounding the internet, and mega corporations using it's power for nefarious agendas. While I mentioned the "Matrix" and "The Truman Show" admittedly the majority of the article was focused around my own personal project that if I ever were to write a science fiction novel it would look similar to that. The idea that through the use of the internet "reality" is slowly being infiltrated, and altered. Quietly, little by little, day by day, the reality of the world around us, what we come to believe is reality, is becoming more fabricated, and more false.

While I believe this would make for a great book unfortunately I think what is really happening is less thrilling, and more insulting towards the human race.

I truly think all the world is a stage, and there are various plays of different sizes going on, many simultaneously, involving actors of different caliber. I believe that there are often unseen forces manipulating the way the world works, to discuss their reasons is to lessen the discussion on their existence.

I believe that those who pull the strings knew of "the internet" at least how we currently know it today. Surely they knew the some of the consequences, and ultimately after it's inception those with less foresight, but great intellect devised ideas such as an "internet of things" in which our everyday household items are spying on us. Where the next war might not be fought on a battle field with guns, but rather a cyber war with hackers going back and forth, using slow methodical logic, and a propaganda war likely waged on a countries own citizens. However, I believe the internet, and it's powers came about much faster than anticipated.

Read more...

Is the Power of the Internet Being Purposely Withheld? Part 1

[Authors Note: This is a very long article that covers a wide range of things, I could have separated them up into smaller articles, however, I had planned on writing an article about the limitation of the internet, and this is how it ended. I feel there is a good deal of information in this article.]
Great minds over the years have written numerous science fiction books that were decades head of the time, and over those years time, and time again we have seen science fiction because science fact. It would seem that the limitation of humans lies nested in the ability to create a thought. If it can be thought, it can be done, albeit eventually.

Look at Walt Disney's "Carousel of Progress", which is a focal point of one of my upcoming articles, for a good example of how much the only only limit is the thought. "If you can dream it, you can do it" - Which was said by none other than Walt Disney. Throughout the Carousel of Progress ride there are numerous things that were predicted, or laughed at the possibility of, as seen from a time previous in the time line. For example the main character, and narrator of the Carousel of Progress, states at one point that he's "even heard of two fellas who are working on some sort of flying machine....ahh it will never work". Of course the wright brothers did in fact get their plane flying, in in less than a century man went from having horse drawn carriages to nuclear powered aircraft carries.

That all being said, we come to the internet. I don't think that the "powers that be" had any idea of just how fast the internet would change the world. Maybe it's changing things just a little too fast for some of their own liking.

There are many theories about the internet, and the unseen hand pulling the strings of reality. For example there is the possibility that a service such as Google could actually be showing you what it thinks you want to see, and if done to a well enough extent, no one would ever know. A sort of mix between the "Truman Show" and "The Matrix".

Read more...