Are U.S. Officials Planning Another Terrorist Attack?

In an article written earlier this week, U.S. Officials Employ Scare Tactics Prior to Their 9/11 Celebration, it was shown that U.S. departments such as Homeland Security were hyping up the fear leading to the anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, of which they plan to use as a platform for self aggrandizement, as well as an excuse to continue to start more wars, continue existing wars, and strip American citizens of more, and more of their rights.

Now U.S. Government sources claim that material found in the Osama Bin Laden compound point to threats on major U.S. anniversary celebrations, although Homeland Security was quick to point out that there is no specific threat.

This is a re-quote from a NBC article quoting a D.H.S. release, which at this time cannot be found.

"As we know from the intelligence gathered from the Osama bin Laden raid, Al[-CIA-]da has shown an interest in important dates and anniversaries, such as 9/11.

"In this instance, it's accurate that there is specific, credible but unconfirmed threat information.

"As we always do before important dates like the anniversary of 9/11, we will undoubtedly get more reporting in the coming days. Sometimes this reporting is credible and warrants intense focus, other times it lacks credibility and is highly unlikely to be reflective of real plots under way. Regardless, we take all threat reporting seriously, and we have taken, and will continue to take all steps necessary to mitigate any threats that arise. We continue to ask the American people to remain vigilant as we head into the weekend."

Below is a release from the Mayor of New York, where he ironically tells those watching to put their faith in the police force, since he claims "[they] have the best police department in the world". If that was the case you would figure that they would allow the 9/11 first responders, many of whom are suffering serious injuries to be able to attend the 9/11 anniversary events, except they are all barred from attending.

It's interesting that this information was gathered at the Osama Bin Laden alleged hideout, which several members of the U.S. Military believe was staged, and fake.

Here is but a few links, and videos, and photos showing that the entire story was contrived:



Here is the iconic "situation room photo"

Staged Situation Room Photo

According to the Times of India

“US president Barack Obama along with his high-level team, watched live coverage in the White House, as the commandos gunned down the world’s most wanted terrorist Osama Bin Laden Via a video camera fixed to the helmet of a US Navy Seal"

however, this cannot be the case, because in an interview with PBS former head of the C.I.A. Leon Panetta  stated 

“Once those teams went into the compound I can tell you that there was a time period of almost 20 or 25 minutes where we really didn’t know just exactly what was going on. And there were some very tense moments as we were waiting for information. 

Perhaps there was information at whatever they raided, hwoever, it certainly didn't come from Osama Bin Laden. The above sources show that the President, and the other people such Rom Emanuel, couldn't possibly seen the footage of Osama Bin Laden being killed, as the sources contradict one another, and the official story is falling apart. There is a cornucopia of other links, and videos that could be shown to prove this story is false, but it would take up far too many pages.

The bottom line, is the U.S. is using data from a location that didn't house Osama Bin Laden, and unfortunately may be gearing up for a false flag on the U.S. on their 10th anniversary celebration of the destruction of our liberties, which has led to increased drug dealing, more illegal immigrants, child kidnapping rings,
Read more...

10 Facts That Prove The Bin Laden Fable Is a Contrived Hoax

Taken from prisionplanet.com & infowars.com


Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, May 9, 2011
Merely a week after President Obama announced the death of Osama Bin Laden, there is literally a deluge of evidence that clearly indicates the whole episode has been manufactured for political gain and to return Americans to a state of post-9/11 intellectual castration so that they can be easily manipulated in the run up to the 2012 election. Here are ten facts that prove the Bin Laden fable is a contrived hoax….

1) Before last Sunday’s raid, every intelligence analyst, geopolitical commentator or head of state worth their salt was on record as stating that Osama Bin Laden was already dead, and that he probably died many years ago, from veteran CIA officer Robert Baer, to former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, to former FBI head of counterterrorism Dale Watson. In addition, back in 2002 Alex Jones was told directly by two separate high level sources that Bin Laden was already dead and that his death would be announced at the most politically opportune moment. Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under five different Presidents, serving as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under the Nixon, Ford and Carter, told the Alex Jones Show last week that Bin Laden died of marfan syndrome shortly after he was visited by CIA physicians at the American Hospital in Dubai in July 2001.

2) The official narrative of how the raid unfolded completely collapsed within days of its announcement. First there had been a 40 minute shootout, then there was no shootout and just one man was armed, first Bin Laden was armed then he was not, first Bin Laden used his wife as a human shield and then he did not. First the compound was described as a “$1 million dollar mansion” then it turned out to be a rubbish-strewn dilapidated compound that was worth less than a quarter of that. Almost every single aspect of the official narrative has changed since Obama first described the raid last Sunday as the White House struggles to keep its story straight.

3) The alleged body of Bin Laden was hastily dumped in the sea to prevent any proper procedure of identification. The White House claimed this was in accordance with normal Islamic burial rituals, however numerous Muslim scholars all over the globe disputed this claim, pointing out that Muslims can only be buried at sea if they die at sea. While the White House claimed that Bin Laden’s death on May 1st was proven by DNA and facial recognition evidence, such proof was never released for public scrutiny and the Obama administration refused to release photos of Bin Laden’s dead body, suggesting a cover-up.

4) Despite the fact that the White House released “situation room” photos which purported to show Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and the rest of Obama’s security staff watching the raid which killed Bin Laden live, it was later admitted by CIA director Leon Panetta that Obama could not have seen the raid because the live feed was cut off before the Navy SEALS entered the compound. The photos were described by many as having “historical significance,” forming a “captivating” record of Obama’s greatest success and being the “defining moment” of his Presidency. One image showed Hillary Clinton with her hand over her mouth as if witnessing an anxious or crucial moment in the raid. Media reports at the time claimed that the photos represented the moment when “The leader of the free world saw the terror chief shot in the left eye.” However, the photos were staged as a PR stunt for public consumption, nobody in the photos ever saw Bin Laden killed live, nor did they see the Navy SEALS even enter the compound.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

5) As even mainstream journalists began to cast suspicion on the official narrative behind the raid, the media reported that Al-Qaeda itself had confirmed every detail of Obama’s address the the nation. However, the conduit for such a claim was in fact an organization called SITE, which is a notorious Pentagon propaganda front run by the daughter of an Israeli spy that has been caught on numerous occasions releasing fake cartoonish “Al-Qaeda” videos at the most politically expedient times for both the Bush and Obama administrations. The SITE organization is nothing more than a contractor for the U.S. government, receiving some $500,000 a year annually from Uncle Sam, and yet the corporate media instantly swallowed and regurgitated the claim that “Al-Qaeda” had confirmed the official story after SITE directed them to an anonymous posting on an Islamic website.
6) Almost every single neighbor that lived near the alleged Bin Laden compound in Abbottabad that was interviewed by news reporters said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there. Since the town is a staging ground for the Pakistani military, which has a training facility situated virtually a stone’s throw away from the alleged Bin Laden compound, residents were required to show ID when they moved into the area. Pakistani troops and anti-terror police in the town refused to confirm that Bin Laden had lived in the house. Barack Obama himself admitted to 60 Minutes that the White House was only 55/45 sure that Osama lived there before the raid and this uncertainty prompted concerns that the US Navy SEALS sent in could have targeted a “prince from Dubai” or some other individual that was not Bin Laden.

7) The videos released by the White House this past weekend which purport to show Osama Bin Laden making Al-Qaeda tapes in October-November 2010 are almost identical to footage first released by Pentagon front group SITE nearly four years ago. Remember, a May 2010 Washington Post story reported how the CIA had admitted to making fake Bin Laden videos. Despite the White House’s insistence that the footage of Bin Laden is recent, he looks younger and healthier than tapes released almost a decade ago, having apparently dyed his beard black. A separate video that purports to show Bin Laden in his compound flicking through satellite TV channels depicts a much older looking man with a gray beard. Analysts have pointed out that the man has different shaped ears to real Osama pictures from back in 2001. A doctor has also pointed out the fact that the man in the tapes released Saturday has no problem moving his left arm, whereas video from 2001 clearly illustrates how Bin Laden was unable to move his left upper extremity because of a permanent injury probably related to damage to the peripheral nerves. Why the cameraman would film the back of Bin Laden’s head as he watches television is also dubious. Residents in the town of Abbottabad claim the man in the “television” video is not Osama, with one individual claiming that the man labeled by the White House as being Bin Laden is actually his neighbor, a man named Akhbar Han.

8: Despite the fact that numerous neo-cons came out on the days after the alleged raid to erroneously assert that torturing terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay led to the discovery of Bin Laden, Osama himself, the supposed world’s most wanted terrorist and a treasure trove of terror information, despite the fact that he was unarmed, was not taken in for questioning, he was instantly shot in the head according to the official narrative.

9) The US government has been caught on several occasions within the past decade staging military operations for the purposes of generating contrived, pro-war sentiment amongst the American public. Both the “rescue” of Jessica Lynch and the death of Pat Tillman were complete fables, scripted and staged at complete odds with the truth and unleashed on Americans as part of a psychological warfare offensive to elicit support for the war on terror, almost identical to what we’re seeing now with the Bin Laden sideshow. Given the fact that the US government has been caught red-handed scripting tales of pure fiction in order to justify the war on terror, notably in the cases of Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman, why on earth should we believe them now?

10) Despite the fact that Obama announced last Sunday on live television that the world was now “safer” because Bin Laden was dead, his administration, with the aid of the fearmongering mass media, instantly seized upon the situation to terrify Americans into being afraid of imminent “reprisal” terror attacks inside the United States, later claiming that Bin Laden had formulated an “aspirational rather than operational” plan to derail US trains that travel over 500mph, although no trains in the US can actually travel at such speeds. This led “terror experts” to salivate over how TSA agents were now needed in shopping malls to stick their hands down Americans’ pants, while New York Senator Chuckie Schumer called for the no fly list to be expanded to trains and subways. Obama hurried to ground zero for a photo op as he desperately tried to use the Bin Laden hoax to whip up phony patriotism as a means of boosting his flagging poll numbers. Others, like Democrat Bill Richardson, exploited the situation to try and push through policies that had no connection to Bin Laden or terrorism at all, like cap and trade. The haste with which the whole Bin Laden fable was exploited for political points scoring and as a psychological ploy to return Americans to a post-9/11 state of intellectual castration was painfully transparent, clearly suggesting that the entire farce was planned well in advance to achieve precisely those goals in the run up to 2012.

*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. 
Read more...

Obama Pushes Osama Damage Control

President Obama has once again changed his, or rather the "official" version of what happened on the night that Osama Bin-Laden was allegedly executed.

It goes without saying that it's odd the United States couldn't capture or kill a single man in the 10 years following his alleged conspiracy to commit murder of about 3000 U.S. citizens, which coincidentally the F.B.I. didn't list on his most wanted sheet because there was not enough evidence.

The story only goes on to get more bizarre when the US claims to have killed the worlds most wanted terrorists amist the collapse of the U.S. dollar, under-reported radiation from the Fukashima Daichi Nuclear Power Plant, and Obama's record spending, and record low-approval rating.

Coupled the fact that Obama has said that sometimes there needs to be "a good distraction" for the American people, it should be unquestioned that even if the official story was true, Obama would enjoy the collateral benefits. The official story was never completely accurate, to put things lightly.

First there was an alleged fire-fight between U.S. Navy Seals and Osama Bin-Laden, in which Osama was armed, and used one of his wifes as a human shield, that lasted roughly 45 minutes. It was later revealed that the firefight was between U.S. forces, and a single guy across the street with a gun, who engaged the U.S. forces.

Speculation continued from the U.S. public, now more weary of the U.S. government, and it's actions, than ever before, which has now led President Obama to be forced to turn his possible false flag trump card, into a burden requiring damage control:


http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7365396n

It's a dangerous doubled edged sword, however.

On the one hand, the rising awareness of the U.S. public to the shady actions of the U.S. government has clearly increased, which is beneficial for the awakening as a whole. On the other hand, however, this will illustrate to the power elite that their margin of power over the masses is diminishing. The elite has been rapidly upping the ante, and they've committed so many crimes, that they have no choice to continue. Forced with this realization, it is fearful that the terror ploys that could be used stemming from Osama's death.
Read more...

What is the Osama End-Game?

What will the Osama end game be?

The government most likely already has a plan for utilizing the Bin-Laden image, however sloppily put together as demonstrated by tossing bodies into the ocean to protect the [incorrect] rights of a dead terrorist. If not then they are likely constructing one currently, most likely attempting to tie as many loose ends from various issues together.

Of the possibilities I see from this event, the false flag, is what concerns me the most. The other issues, such as loss of freedoms, and liberties, or increased T.S.A. presence, etc, would all come as a trickle down effect from the more severe outcomes.

If a false flag is implemented it would have to be significantly more advance than 9/11, and due to the speed of information, it would have to be pull off almost flawlessly. The government as an entity, and many people working within it, albeit on different levels of the lie, have committed so many felonies it has become all or nothing, and they will go with the best plan they have.

There are three possibilities:

False Flag Attack - Direct:
This example is the most obvious. Using information/intelligence gathered directly from the alleged incident, all sorts of things could be fabricated. It might be showed that he knew how to build some super virus, so now we have to get blood taken at airports, or it might show some plan in action in which the "good guys" rush in to save the day, and defuse a bomb with a timer on "0:01" just like Hollywood movies.

http://www.infowars.com/feds-issue-terror-advisory-based-on-info-allegedly-found-at-osamas-house/ the government is exploiting the Osama death fantasy as an excuse to expand the police state grid in the United States and acclimate the populace to the presence of militarized cops and unconstitutional random searches in mass transit hubs.

False Flag - Two Tier
This would be a two-tier false flag, where using the original false flag, which a smaller group of people are "in the know" about, would then lead to a second false flag, which could be used to get more people in on the scam, or be used to obscure attention from what really happened, or the stepping stone that would've lead to the second event.


False Flag - Triggered:
This scenario is where using the events we have created, i.e. Osama's death, some other events are triggered, which the U.S. can either then attack, or piggyback their terrorism.

To clarify: A group of Muslims might be upset over Osama's death, and start a rally, and attack someplace in Africa. That might happen to be closer to Libya that some of our other troops, so we can send them over there instead. That way we luckily don't have to create any enemies, and some pop up in a strategic location.
Read more...