Monday, December 23, 2013

Colored Squares on Plastic Tubes Not Substitute for Due Diligence.

First off I'd like to apologize for the lack of posts I've made in the recent weeks, and months. I will make an effort to increase the frequency of which I do so.

I hope everyone is have a good holiday season, and is gearing up for a very Merry Christmas.

The article below is an article I came across on my Facebook feed, and have seen this story floating around the interwebs. I decided to read it, and then make a response, and figured that both should be posted to the blog. 

_____________________________

Read more...

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Is Your Red My Blue? Google's Gatekeeping Abilities.

The title of this article stems from an interesting question I used to find it entertaining to ask people, and engage in the thought conversation that follows.

How do you know that what you see as blue, I also see as blue?

When we are children we learn the colors, and learn to associate them objects. Objects the look the same color as the object originally associated with a color in turn are also associated with that color. We learn that the sky is blue. The ocean looks similar to the sky, therefor it is also blue. However, if one of us actually saw the sky as red, we would see the ocean looking like the sky, however we are told that the sky is "blue".  So although we are seeing two totally different colors we will not know this because since our information is coming from a unified source, be it our parents or the schooling system, when asked "what color is the sky" we will both respond blue.

What does this have to do with Google? Quite literally a gatekeeper is someone who holds the keys, to access something. In the current day a gatekeeper is someone usually associated with having the illusion of providing information will covertly keeping information from people, or giving them false or misleading information.

It is currently believed that most people in the U.S. have access to an open internet. There are relatively few restrictions to what you can access on the "internet" as it is known within the basic domain name structures of www, and ignoring the deeper "darknets" and parts of the internet people either don't know exist or don't have the technical knowledge to know how they operate. If you want to look up something, you have the free will to do so. From pornography to cooking tips, if you want it, you can find it.

Some areas of the world do not have that apparent freedom, however. For example China has large sections of the internet blocked off. When attempting to access a website they will never get the return signal, it will be intercepted, and blocked, or their request will never be allowed to be sent. This allows the administrators to determine what a person is allowed to access, or not. Material that is negative to the ruling administration in China is often censored. Likewise many companies block access to gaming websites to keep their employees productivity higher, and schools block access to pornography to prevent students from accessing that type of adult content.

Read more...

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Is Kingergarten a Good Thing?

Is Kindgarten a Good Thing?

Definition:
Kindergarten, from German. Kinder - Children; Garten - Garden. 
Often English speakers will misspell the word as kindergarden, and often assume that it is the correct spelling. While it is not the correct literal spelling, perhaps it should be the correct spelling for it's modern day usage, and people will associate it with what it really is. As the root of the word shows, it's a garden for children. One could look at this as a loving place to nurture children, but it also the very beginning of indoctrination in a system of beliefs that have very little to do with personal growth, and everything to do with growing to meet standards set by others.

There is a lot of controversy of the successes or failures of the public schooling system in America, and the growing number of parents who choose to home school their children. It may be surprising, or perhaps not as there is nothing new under the Sun, that the same debates about the public education system have previously occurred.

Kindergarten was actually banned in Prussia, and most German states in 1851, and wasn't allowed again for almost 60 years, and even then there was restrictions.

Read more...

Friday, June 28, 2013

Google Reads Your E-Mail Before You Send It (But Everyone Already Knew)

One of the biggest big brother issues that has recently been revealed has been that of the PRISM program. A N.S.A. program that installs hubs into the servers of various companies, and collects EVERYTHING, on EVERYONE without a warrant.

Leaked  Official PRISM Slide - with PRISM targets.








Unfortunately this has been known for quite some time by the people "in the know" sort to speak, however, it has been obvious, but ignored by those who had this information put literally in front of their faces.

Proof that Google actively reads e-mail as you type, at the least reads them before sending them for the apologists.
Image from screenshot of GMail composition 6/12/13 - As if 6/28/13 image still appears.
The above image is taken from a screenshot of a GMail user attempting to send an e-mail. In the body of the e-mail it said "I have attached", however, there was no files attached to the e-mail. The writer had chosen to embed the said file, and used the phrase attached, instead of uploading it as an attachment. Due to this Google decided to nicely warn the user they may have forgotten to attach a file - it also alerts the user that the contents of all E-mail is read not only when sent, but before it is sent.

Read more...

Massachusetts in Bed With Bank of America

Is the tax funded government of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts actually in bed with Bank of America, a company that received an estimated $45bn. That is $45 Billion or 4 thousand 500 million dollars.

A lengthy multi-part article will be coming shortly, as soon as the research is put together, and talks are in the works with publishers regarding publishing this investigative piece.


Read more...

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Abortion, Murder, and Run Down Conditions - A Look at Planned Parenthood

Yesterday a Philadelphia Dr. was convicted of murder for his role in terminating the life of babies that were born as a result of a failed abortion.

Many people, on both sides of the abortion debate, fail to see the significance of such a decision, assuming it gets upheld. This case, or cases similar to it, very well may force the Supreme Court to re-visit Roe v. Wade.

A particularly interesting aspect of the case is that it has been alleged that the tipping point for the jury wasn't the acts committed in this case, but rather the conditions in which the acts had taken place. The clinic where this Dr. murdered babies was described as a filth ridden clinic, and not a glistening white pristine operating room. Further in the article it's illustrated why such clinics are in such deplorable conditions.


The reason that this is so important is because it follows a controversial Senate testimony from the head of Planned Parenthood, which is the worlds largest abortion program. The testimony revolved around the issue of what should happen if a Dr. preformed an abortion, and it failed resulting in the live birth of the child.


Planned Parenthood is an organization that has faced harsh backlash, especially from the Christian community, for their believe in when live begins. They believe that live begins at birth, and not at conception, which is the basis for their pro-abortion programs.



There would be an inherent hypocrisy if Planned Parenthood were to state that failed abortions that result in a live birth should have the Dr and staff try as hard as possible to save the live of the child, as well as considering the health, and live of the mother. If the Dr. were not performing some godlike operation in which through course were able to convert a non-living segment of flesh into a live human then such a contradiction would not exist, however no such case has ever been made.

Therefor it follows that a baby that is born alive after a failed abortion, would have been alive previous to the abortion. It would then open up an entire Pandora's box for Planned Parenthood because the Dr's performing abortions would have no way of knowing if a baby will be able to live, albeit miraculously, and may unknowingly be violating their Hippocratic oath, and committing murder.

The recent conviction, and sentencing of life in prison, of a Dr. who was terminating the life of babies born as the result of failed abortions shows that this is not merely a thought experiment, but that it has real world implications, and even further that such acts are already being carried out.

It should come as no surprise that Planned Parenthood wouldn't advocate for saving the life of babies born as a failed abortion, and that rather the that babies live should be terminated. That is because that Planned Parenthood is an organization based upon death. Their own numbers show that the 78% of their patients are at 150% or below the poverty level, and that 71% of their services are that of "prevent[ing] unintended pregnancies".

Planned Parenthood estimates that about 5million people receive their services worldwide. That means that 3,550,000 people each year receive services to prevent unintended pregnancies and of those 2,796,000 were below 150% of the federal poverty level. They have an annual operating budget of  $1,111,700,000 of which only 17% goes to actual abortion services which amounts to 188,989,000. An average abortion ran $468 in the U.S. in 2001 (Guttmacher Institute Study 2001).  This means that the cost to cover only their poor patients abortions would be $1,392,408,000.

That means that Planned Parenthood is somehow saving over 280 million dollars on the cost of abortions. Is it any shock that many of these poor areas receive poor care, especially extrapolated from the care given to women in the U.S., as illustrated by this recent case.

From their own words, and numbers Planned Parenthood is an organization that is devoted to Eugenics, ,and not the reproductive health of women worldwide who have unintended pregnancies.  Is should be no surprise that Dr's carrying out abortions commit, and are convicted of murder.
Read more...

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Live: Massachusetts tax money funding "disaster drills"

I'm currently at the Salem commuter rail section where a train has been converted to a "disaster drill" training station according to a officer on the site. Video, audio, and pictures will be posted soon as I'm on my phone awaiting a train to Boston for surgery.





Update: December 23rd, 2013:
Please forgive me for not updating this story in many months. However, due to the recent rise in incidents that have involved "drill" aspects. I felt not would be a pertain ant time to make sure this article gets up stated.

I'll be locating all the images I have taken of this situation, and uploading them as soon as possible. Lately the public has seen a lot of "drills" go live.

Regardless of individuals stance on a particular issue, all the information being released (by this blog in particular) is important, because more important than pushing a particular few point, the mere release of information to others, and allowing them to make their own decisions on the nature of the reality around them.

What sucks is that I'm constantly on my phone, and the battery dies very quickly. I'm hoping to be able to get a new phone in the not too distant future so I'm able to pursue these stories, and angles in a more professional, and timely manner. In the mean time I appreciate your understanding while I work on these issues


















































Read more...

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Boston Bombing and Operation Gladio

There is a host of videos from Sibel Edmonds, a former top F.B.I. translator, and whistle blower, that outlines the massive operations in the Caucuses known as Gladio B.

For those who don't have 4 plus hours to listen to the interviews from Edmonds and James Corbett that were published in February and March 2013 there is an excellent summary interview with David Knight of infowars. This video will summarize some of the various elements of the Boston bombing and how they tie into U.S. operations in Chechnya.






Read more...

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Freedom of Information Request filed with Watertown Police Department.

[Editors note 5/10/2013: As  of today there has been mo response for the F.O.I.A request that was delivered by the U.S.P.S. to the Watertown P.D. on 4/24/2013. It now seems that the body has mysteriously disappeared, and the autopsy results may never come out.]

Edit: For the record a copy of this was e-mailed to the Watertown Police Department at 6:40 A.M. E.S.T.



David Miles Harkins
XXXXX
XXXXX
To the custodian of records for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts municipality of Watertown's Police Department.

Watertown Police Department
552 Main Street
Watertown, MA 02472
     RECORDS REQUEST
Dear Records Request Officer:
Pursuant to the state open records act I am preemptively requesting permission to receive, and review copies of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the alleged bomber of the recent Boston Marathon. Pursuant to Massachusetts law I believe that in due time the parents of Tamerlan Tsarnaev will consent, and write a written affidavit releasing the autopsy records, and if such as time of review of the request such an event has occurred, then there should be no problems releasing said records pursuant to the exemptions laid out in the case (Boston Firefighters Union, IAFF, Local 718 v. WHDH TV, Channel 7, No. A.C.2007-J-455 (Mass. App. Ct. Oct. 5, 2007).

Additionally I request all available information on the now deceased Tamerlan Tsarnaev, as well as the unidentified naked man that was taken into custody by Watertown Police. Please feel free to review the video below if there is any question as to the identity of the suspect of whom records are requested:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9D8mz83ht8

According to the Supervisor of Public Records statement in 2003 that �Anyone can get any police record at anytime upon request. The record may be redacted to remove bits of information such as witness and victim's names and addresses. After a redaction takes place, [the custodian] must explain in writing to the requester what information was redacted and the specific reasons why the record was sanitized. The remaining portions of the record must then be released.�.

Pursuant to SPR Bulletin 3-03, Public Record Requests and C.O.R.I. (Nov. 21, 2003) I additionally request that full explanations for any sanitized documents that are released with regards to the autopsy, and, or police records related to Tamerlan Tsarnaev as well as the unidentified naked man taken into custody.
I agree to pay reasonable duplication fees for the processing of this request.
If my request is denied in whole or part, I ask that you justify all deletions by reference to specific exemptions of the act.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,

David Miles Harkins

Read more...

Friday, April 19, 2013

Boston Marathon and Journalistic Integrity Shot Dead

When there are major tragedies the major news outlets are often, albeit increasingly less due to alternative media, turned to for up to date information on significant events. There is an expectation that the resources of the company are able to be utilized to get information, and then disseminate that information via reporters. Otherwise many without the connections, or money, wouldn't be able to get such information, for example high profile interviews.

This is of course no different with the recent Boston Marathon attack. The integrity of a reporter, or news agency, is to check the validity of the information that they present to the public. To vet that information, along with the sources they get it from. On the contrary it's become a race to see who can post the story first, knowing that they simply create a different version, and insist that one was true, and their original was false. The whole while expecting the public to continuously believe that anything they say if fact, and even have the power to change facts at will to suit their needs.

Today Boston Police shot and killed one of the alleged suspects of the bombing, an Indian man named Sunil Tripathi. This was a "fact" confirmed by Boston Police. Mr. Tripathi was an Indian who has gone missing around a month ago, and was allegedly depressed, his parents were looking for his despondently  One could assume that Mr. Tripathi s fit the description of someone to be used as a patsy, was abducted  killed, and claimed to be the bomber. Or that his body will never be found allowing there to be a massive manhunt that continues due to the bogey men of Dorner, and Bin-Laden are gone. (A separate article will be up shortly)

Mr. Tripathi was an Indian man, who was allegedly depressed, and had been missing for months, and allegedly had written a suicide note. If someone knew he was dead, or had him captive to later kill him, and claim a heroic cop captured him, then people may not question the narrative, due to the depressive secluded back-story  as well as his physical resemblance to a pair of brothers the Tsarnaev's.

Why is Mr. Tripathi's similarities in appearance to someone else have anything to do with the bombing? Because the man the Boston Police shot, and killed was the "suspect". The New York Times identified Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, as the deceased suspect. The second suspect happens to be Dzhokhar A Tsarnaev, Tamerlan's brother.
How can the mainstream dinosaur media, or the police be trusted with anything when they tell the public that they have "confirmed" information, only latter to say it was wrong but their new information is "confirmed"?

The media's lack of integrity doesn't stop there. They also like to edit their websites without making any notice of retractions, in violation of journalistic ethics. Below are screen shots showing two different articles, the two different stories, along with the accompanying  information about them.

This image was taken from an  AP webpage at 12:08 P.M. E.S.T. on 4/19/2012  The blacked out area's of the image are simply privacy.
Screenshot taken 4/19/13 by Xieon Politics from International Business Times India. At 1 P.M. E.S.T,, the same  day. Blacked out area's are privacy. 

Another piece of disgusting, shamefully being called, pieces of journalism. 


Read more...

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Recent Facebook Reponse RE: False Flags

A friend of mine posted in reply to my Facebook post about the recent Boston bombings, and Boston Marathon. As I believe I had posted previously mentioned my father ran in the marathon, and finished around 5-10 minutes before the explosion went off. Luckily my entire family, who were in attendance are all safe.

For privacy I will block out the names, and links of the conversation, however the conversation will not be edited otherwise.
My dad just finished the Boston Marathon 5 minutes before an explosion took place at the finish line. At this point it is looking like a terrorist attack in most likely a false flag terrorist attack
  • False flag bro. That's right u and trump and Carl Rove can keep reading each others posts then call them facts cause the other person said it, even though the person saying it was making it up as a REPUBLICAN to make themselves feel better
    48 minutes ago
  • Just like that bitchy on FOX ASKED Carl Rove even as FOX had already projected Obama as the winner if the math he was doing saying Romney could still win Ohio at this point was just math u do as a republican to make urself feel better
    Monday at 3:43pm
  •  Most likely a false flag terrorist attack! By who? Obama? To gain what? If anything it would be ur retarded Ass republican party trying to make him look bad then spin it so its his fault cause IT'S OBVIOUS SO SO SO SO obvious that repubs cant win an election with facts cause no facts are in their favor policy speaking so keep saying these things republicans so u can lose this special election and the next presidential elections as well, thank u
    Monday at 3:47pm
  • And Not to go there but when a terrorist attack happened like 9/11 president Bush wasn't jumped on instantly he had the whole nation behind him then let bin Laden get away then invaded Iraq which again had no WMDs so.... The list keeps going for miles but I am done now just had to be said
    Monday at 3:48pm  
     [John Doe], what you are talking about doesn't have a thing to do with what I said. You are taking other peoples arguments, and placing them on me, and then assuming since they are Republican, and assuming I am, we must agree.

    I formulate my own opinions.

    Nero, Emperor of Rome, stood by and watched Rome burn. Most people know that. However the reason he allowed Rome to burn was because the Roman senate refused to allow him to tear down 1/3 of the city in order to build his new structures. As a result of such fire, he was able to do so. Quid pro quo? Who benefits?

    Previous to Hitlers rise to power he had his forces burn down the Reichstag building, which would be equivalent of burning down the Hall of Congress. He then blamed the attack on his political opponents, and that helped him gain the support to become the leader of Germany not simply German chancellor.

    In the 1960's the US Joint Chiefs of Staff drafted a plan called Operation Northwoods where they were going to blow up a jet and blame it on Cuba in order to get National support for Cuba.

    In the 1980's The US, N.A.T.O. and European countries actually carried out terrorist attacks across Europe for different purposes, to blame different people. However, they were not real "terrorists". Recently the Italian government declassified this, which is known as "Operation Gladio" and interesting enough this involved attacking movie theaters, as well as sporting events.

    1994: The Oklahoma City bombing. This happened right around the time the Congress was about to pass heavy 10th Amendment legislation, which would limit the power of the Federal Government, and make states much stronger. Bill Clinton was the President at the time, and in a position to lose the Presidency (side note: something Obama is not), and was against the 10th Amendment movement. A Federal building, the JP Murrer building was blown up, ,and blamed on Extreme White Radicals many from Elohim (city of God) city, which was setup by the C.I.A.). After that 10th Amendment went on the back burner. Later after Bill won the election he was asked by a reporter, while flying together on Air Force 1, what he owes his victory to? Bill Clinton respond saying that he "owe[s] it all to [O.K.C].

    September 11th allowed us to go into Afghanistan, which is rich in lithium, and Iraq which is rich in oil. Regardless of the military industrial complex which President Eisenhower warned in his final speech as President needs wars to make new weapons, to sell. Additionally it's known that many rich families gained their wealth by financing both sides of a fighting war. By the way the underwear bomber allowed us to put to use the naked, back-scatter, body machines at airports which were ordered months previously by a man who has connections to that very company. The underwear bomber also gave way to the "enhanced pat down".

    [John Doe], you're Jewish right? So to do what you did to me in your argument, you must know about the Lavon Affair. That was an Israeli special forces operation where Israel was going to attack the US, British, and Egyptian targets, and the people who were going to carry it out were Egyptians. The goal was to blame the attack on the Muslim Brotherhood in order to get Britain to retake part of Egypt, which would help Israel greatly having a specific canal under "friendly" "allied" control. (The same ally they attacked).

    Those are all documented, declassified facts. Nothing from what Carl Rove said, who I don't agree with as a person despite being Republican. This shows that over the course of history there have been many incidents of "terrorism" that have led others to benefit.

    Now, as far as what is the benefit of this? If a gun was used I would say gun control. However, there has been a recent push back against the use of police drones, as well as US drones that have the capability to fly above New York, take a picture of half the entire city, and if you were to zoom in on a computer you could make out every detail 6inches of bigger. 2 planes means you can see all of New York all the time, potentially 24/7.

    There were reports of a suspicious man being denied entry shortly before the bombing, and then turning and disappearing into the crowd. If we had the ability to see every inch of the city at all times then all we would have to do is relying the video, and simply play it from when we see the man, and follow him everywhere he goes. He would be caught very easily.

    An additional thing could be the use of TSA agents on the street. There are already TSA agents at train stations, and some localized events. There have been talks of placing the same type naked body scanners in cities on streets. Basically a sandwich, and you can have everyone just walk in a line down the street and agents can see everything as they walk by. They already have devices both stationary, and mounted on trucks that can do this. You could even go so far that certain parts of cities will become locked down unless you get in through this enhanced security.

    I could go on for quite some which, however, there has without a doubt been false flags in the past. Its confirmed the top US military command wanted to kill US citizens on US soil for military profit, and public support. (Speaking of public support listen to all the people "I can't wait to kill this bastard" "ya lets get them" "Glass them". People are all very emotional, and will back things they normally wouldn't do otherwise. Think maybe people will vote to allow drones constantly watching everyone to prevent this from happening again??

    Republicans and Democrats are two sides of same coin. Just like Roses evil known by any other name is still evil.

Read more...

Monday, April 15, 2013

Shamefull Fox 25 News Report


Fox 25 News in Boston recently ran a piece around 10:35 -> 10:42 P.M. E.S.T. in which they stated that citizens are being urged that even though they may be embarrassed that "if they see something, say something" - the governments citizen snitch brigade propaganda slogan.

Essentially this pieces indirectly blames the citizens for the horrific events at the Boston Marathon today, such as a man bearing witness to several horrific amputations (source: aforementioned news clip). Clearly if we as a society were better snitches against our fellow citizens then this even would have been prevented.


This is was a spineless decisions by the author to portray such an ideology, and equally shameful the actions of the programming direction. This blog posting serves also as an open letter to Fox 25 News - of which hard mail copies will be sent tomorrow - that they are requested to formally apologize for the way they characterized the citizens of the commonwealth as portraying them as to be at fault for today's horrific events.

If Fox News wishes to discuss this with me I'd be happy to have them e-mail me at harkins.dave@gmail.com
-Dave (Xieon Politcs)



Read more...

Alex Jones on Why The Bostom Massacre has All the Signs of a False.


Read more...

Immigration Comparison Photo

This is a photo I was sent that is making it's way across the internet. I was so inclined to share it.
Original Source: Unknown
The scary part is that the racial divisions that this issue causes, and the debt created are exactly the reason amnesty laws are proposed. Programs such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the North American superhighway that runs from Canada to Mexico, as well as the proposed Amero, which would be the combination of the Canadian, United States, and Mexican currency.

The EURO has been a complete disaster, ,and such is a result when you attempt to merge different cultures, and economies. The same would result from the Amero.

If there is any doubt that this is done by design look no further than the mainstream media which constantly pushes racism, and white guilt, and attempts to make this a racist issue. However it's an illegal issue. The aforementioned mainstream, dinosaur, media is a major reason why many people don't notice the above image says nothing about illegal immigrants from Mexico, however, many will still call it racist against Hispanics.


Read more...

Disclaimer

A new disclaimer is currently being written, and will be posted in this space when available.