The Truth Behind Angelina Jolie and her Double Masectomy

While speaking with friends today I realized that I have never published my article on Angelina Jolie, and no longer have the draft which is unfortunate because I lost a lot of connected dots.


Most are aware that Angelina Jolie underwent a double voluntary mastectomy. That is likely the extent people heard of this. However, there is a machine working behind Angelina Jolie in a scientifically cold fashion that puts Angelina to shame for everything she alleges to be.

Angelina claims to be a "feminst" and promoting womans issues. Her double mastectomy was hearled as a great feminist move, by giving woman the chance to determine if they have a gene that could lead to breast cancer, and remove the threat before it becomes malignant and spreads. If she was really a feminist she would be embracing the female figure, the shape of the goddess, the clearly female image full with breasts. Instead of focusing on how thousands of women are being maimed, and disfigured by having breast cancer, and how a large part of their external feminism is taken from them, she instead engages on a fear propaganda parade scaring woman into think that they need to get this new test. They too may be able to prevent getting breast cancer later on in life if they catch the gene, and remove the breasts early. A true feminist should be outraged that the female figure of beauty is being destroyed, and Angelina claims to be a feminist saying that the removal of breasts that is horrible when done due to cancer, should be voluntary.

The break down of society, the blurring of gender lines, the destruction of what is typically masculine, and feminine is one aspect of Angelina Jolies stunt, which exactly what is what.

Another aspect of her stunt was the timing. Angelina was featured on the May, 2013 cover of Time Magazine, which had the effect of spreading her story far, and gaining a massive amount of publicity. There were scores of young woman who saw Angelina as being "brave" for what she did, and they they too should take the test to possibly save themselves from the future.

The reason this timing is so important is because the company that offered the testing, which Angelina used to determine she had the gene, is known as Myriad Genetics. This company is in the buisness of isolating human genes, and then patenting them meaning anyone who wants to use their test, has to pay their price, and if another Dr does the test for a lower income patient for less they will get sued by Myriad's massive legal department. The test would cost as little as $100 if it was unregulated, on average it's $4000 while Myriad held the patent. Myriad Genetics was involved in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case in which the Supreme Court would determine if a company could patent genes, and in effect basically decide who lives, and dies on who can afford their treatment.

The Supreme Court issued their decision on June 13th, 2013 in an unanimous decision rejected Myriads position of patenting genes, and thus barring Myriad of any companies in the future from doing the same thing. It shouldn't take a great deal of critical thinking to understand why patenting parts of the human body is at the best unethical, and at worst strictly evil. It's no conincidence that a month before the decision Angelina had a huge publicity stunt, featured on numerous news shows, articles, across the internet, and on the cover of time. This was to turn public opinion in favor of companies such as Myriad, potentially swaying the courts decision.

The third aspect of Angelina's stunt is it's using misinformation, complicated scientific jargon many don't understand, and in some cases just lying to push an agenda to make money. First the BRCA1 gene which is tested for - is present in every living mammal. If you inherent a single copy from your parent that has the mutation that causes cancer then the test would be understandable, however, science shows that the majority of cases are caused by external variables, and that a person with a healthy BRCA1 gene can over time undergo the mutation. One of the reasons breast cancer is on such a massive rise is because of all the cancer causing chemicals in the environment mimic estrogen, and the breasts of a female experience several stages of new cell growth, birth, puberty, pregnancy, meta-pose.

Here is an excellent medical journal study exposing the problem, that was just published this year. There are several statistic that stand out, and it's hard to pick just one to illustrate the magnitude of this scientific hoax.

Of the 251 women who strongly considered CPM, we found that those who ultimately received CPM (n = 81) were significantly different from those who ultimately received UM or BCS (n = 170). The former group was significantly more often white (71.6% vs 22.9%) (P < .001), highly educated (88.9% vs 44.9%) (P < .001)

Interesting that of the study group the women who underwent having both their breast removed were highly educated white women. Would it be a stretch to assume they probably could afford the $4000 tests of which the poorer minorities could no way afford. I encourage readers to read my article "Abortion, Murder, and Run Down Conditions - A look at Planned Parenthood"  which gives much more abortions to those below the poverty line, than even those hovering around it, most are minorities, and they somehow save millions on operating costs, plus PP was originally a eugenics organization. This is similar, drive up fear of a deadly disease, and the need for a test to detect it. Those who can pay, will pay. Those who can't, won't. Either way people will still develop cancer, and pay at that stage, but this allows the medical industry to suck out extra money from the wealthy who get their medical advice from Angelina Jolie.

Read more...

Abortion, Murder, and Run Down Conditions - A Look at Planned Parenthood

Yesterday a Philadelphia Dr. was convicted of murder for his role in terminating the life of babies that were born as a result of a failed abortion.

Many people, on both sides of the abortion debate, fail to see the significance of such a decision, assuming it gets upheld. This case, or cases similar to it, very well may force the Supreme Court to re-visit Roe v. Wade.

A particularly interesting aspect of the case is that it has been alleged that the tipping point for the jury wasn't the acts committed in this case, but rather the conditions in which the acts had taken place. The clinic where this Dr. murdered babies was described as a filth ridden clinic, and not a glistening white pristine operating room. Further in the article it's illustrated why such clinics are in such deplorable conditions.


The reason that this is so important is because it follows a controversial Senate testimony from the head of Planned Parenthood, which is the worlds largest abortion program. The testimony revolved around the issue of what should happen if a Dr. preformed an abortion, and it failed resulting in the live birth of the child.


Planned Parenthood is an organization that has faced harsh backlash, especially from the Christian community, for their believe in when live begins. They believe that live begins at birth, and not at conception, which is the basis for their pro-abortion programs.



There would be an inherent hypocrisy if Planned Parenthood were to state that failed abortions that result in a live birth should have the Dr and staff try as hard as possible to save the live of the child, as well as considering the health, and live of the mother. If the Dr. were not performing some godlike operation in which through course were able to convert a non-living segment of flesh into a live human then such a contradiction would not exist, however no such case has ever been made.

Therefor it follows that a baby that is born alive after a failed abortion, would have been alive previous to the abortion. It would then open up an entire Pandora's box for Planned Parenthood because the Dr's performing abortions would have no way of knowing if a baby will be able to live, albeit miraculously, and may unknowingly be violating their Hippocratic oath, and committing murder.

The recent conviction, and sentencing of life in prison, of a Dr. who was terminating the life of babies born as the result of failed abortions shows that this is not merely a thought experiment, but that it has real world implications, and even further that such acts are already being carried out.

It should come as no surprise that Planned Parenthood wouldn't advocate for saving the life of babies born as a failed abortion, and that rather the that babies live should be terminated. That is because that Planned Parenthood is an organization based upon death. Their own numbers show that the 78% of their patients are at 150% or below the poverty level, and that 71% of their services are that of "prevent[ing] unintended pregnancies".

Planned Parenthood estimates that about 5million people receive their services worldwide. That means that 3,550,000 people each year receive services to prevent unintended pregnancies and of those 2,796,000 were below 150% of the federal poverty level. They have an annual operating budget of  $1,111,700,000 of which only 17% goes to actual abortion services which amounts to 188,989,000. An average abortion ran $468 in the U.S. in 2001 (Guttmacher Institute Study 2001).  This means that the cost to cover only their poor patients abortions would be $1,392,408,000.

That means that Planned Parenthood is somehow saving over 280 million dollars on the cost of abortions. Is it any shock that many of these poor areas receive poor care, especially extrapolated from the care given to women in the U.S., as illustrated by this recent case.

From their own words, and numbers Planned Parenthood is an organization that is devoted to Eugenics, ,and not the reproductive health of women worldwide who have unintended pregnancies.  Is should be no surprise that Dr's carrying out abortions commit, and are convicted of murder.
Read more...

It's Time To Wake the People Up! Guerrilla Info-Warfare

Just like the term implies, much like Guerrilla warfare, Guerrilla wake ups is the process of having to wake people up to the issues surrounding them. If only a small percentage of the population who are considered the colloquial term "sheeple" then the globalists would be defeated over night. Unlike the OWS folks, who simply preach talking points that are shockingly similar to the far liberal ideology.

It's hypocritical to preach something, and not follow it, so here are the following stories.

Fiat Currency, Federal Reserve, Ron Paul
While going to McDonalds the other night that cashier asked if I would like my $0.03 cents back. I proceeded to tell her that of course I want my counterfeit fiat money which is losing value every day.

The girl had a puzzled look on her face, and I told her to look up the Federal Reserve, and the raping of tax-payers. At the next window, I had the same girlfGor, so I proceeded to tell her Ron Paul for President 2012.  She was really confused by this encounter, however, hopefully at least one new person will go home, do some research, spread the word to family, and friends, which is a great success since word of mouth is very powerful, and it grows exponentially. The Tea Party and OWS, initially,  were great examples of this concept.



Read more...

Gardasil Full Insert.

Many people don't realize that the information on drug advertisements act just as that, as advertisements. Most people don't get to see the actual information regarding the drug, until after they are taking it, if at all. Here is a link to the full insert for Gardasil, or which will be included in a future article breaking down the Merck marketing push, and the Gardasil patent. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM111263.pdf
Read more...

Rick Perry Gets Paid to Have Girls Injected with Substances!

Could Rick Perry Actually Make Money for Injecting Girls with Needles?

Could Texas Governor Rick Perry actually be making money by having teenage girls injected with solutions through hypodermic needles, and that's not even getting into the poisons, and heavy metals in said solutions.

The answer very well may be, a surprising YES. Corruption? In Politics? Can't be. There must be a reasonable explanation, so lets go explain this away so no one will notice that Rick Perry supported Hillary Care, or was Al Gore Chief of Staff.

In a report posted to "The Washington Post: Post Politics Blog" that said he had uncovered first that Rick Perry had admitted to getting $5,000 from Merck (who makes Guardasil, which he peddles, remember) proudly saying in the conversation  

"I raise about $30 million. And if you’re saying that I can be bought for $5,000, I’m offended".

Personally, I don't want my President to be bought off BY ANY AMOUNT OF MONEY. The President should be bought off by the Constitution.
Ultimately the post reported that an estimated $3,388,000 was given to Rick Perry from the Merck Corportation and it's subsideries, and a conincidental 35 million vaccinnes were given out that was pointless.

In case your missed it, Rick Perry allowed 35 needles to enter teenage girls bodies for a vaccine that does nothing.
Read more...

Local Colleges Peddling Fluoride to Students

On the first day of classes for the Fall 2011 semester, one local Massachusetts college was giving away free samples, alongside various fliers and pass outs about various school activities, organizations, and other college specific materials.

One would think that the samples would have to do with something college related, education related, or from local businesses and organizations, however that is not the case.

The college, of which I will not list by name in this article, instead has a giant basket of toothpaste. Yes, toothpaste, because apparently the college wants their students to have healthy, bright, white teeth, thanks to "Crest 3D White" toothpaste. Which says nicely on the label "fluoride anticavity toothpaste".

Nothing like poisoning the upcoming generation with fluoride which has been proven to be essentially useless, and comes from the waste of mining for phosphate fertilizer, and if often mixed with other substances. There have also been reports of more harmful substances such as radionuclides being mixed with fluoride in water, however, based on just the information from the E.P.A. website, they admit to having arsenic, lead, and other heavy metals, and that 1 - 3% of flouride have it, and they have set allowable levels for these metals. If the E.P.A. admits it, then the numbers are obviously much, much higher.

For those who are interested in learning more about fluoride, but here's one video:


When I find the excellent video I'm attempting to find, I'll be posting that here as well.
Read more...